ABSTRACT
Objectives: A LSR is a systematic review that is continually updated, incorporating new evidence as it becomes available. They are conducted in research areas where new evidence is constantly emerging on diagnostic methods, treatments, and outcomes. The objective of this study was to understand the current application of LSRs across research areas. Method(s): Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched to identify LSRs. Only the most recent update of a LSR was included. Data regarding the indication, intervention, methods, frequency of updates, and funding were extracted. Result(s): Of the 1,243 records identified, 126 LSRs were included for analysis. The first LSR was published in 2015, with a significant increase in the number of LSRs published starting in 2020, coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. The most common indication represented by LSRs was COVID-19 (72%), followed by oncology (10%). Other indications with LSRs included chronic pain, traumatic brain injury, and skin disorders, among others. While most oncology LSRs identified interventional randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) (85%), only 54% of COVID-19 LSRs were restricted to interventional studies, including a combination of RCTS and real-world observational studies. Oncology LSRs included common cancers such as prostate, renal, or multiple myeloma. Of the reviews that reported update frequency, 28% planned monthly, 12% yearly, and 12% weekly updates. Only 46% of LSRs were registered. The majority of LSRs were funded by government or research organizations. Objectives of LSRs varied, with most stating the need to maintain up-to-date databases;however, several studies used LSRs to facilitate network meta-analysis or mixed treatment comparisons. Conclusion(s): While LSRs were introduced over five years ago, their frequency increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Apart from COVID-19, LSRs are commonly used in oncology settings. LSRs provide high-level, relevant, and up-to-date evidence, making them a useful tool for clinical and real-world research.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objective: Representing diverse perspectives in medical publications is of great importance. We assessed diversity among investigators, study participants, authors and tweeters of recent publications on COVID-19 vaccine trials, a topic likely to have significant global implications. Research design and methods: Primary publications reporting on COVID vaccine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified via PubMed (n=302 hits, 23 September 2022). The 100 articles with the greatest impact (Altmetric score) were selected for evaluation. National affiliation of authors and investigators, and demographics of participants were collected. Geographic locations of Tweets mentioning the publications were collected via Altmetric. Result(s): In our preliminary analysis, as expected, selected publications most frequently appeared in top-tier journals, e.g. New England Journal of Medicine (n=24) and Lancet (n=19), and had high Altmetric scores (median 886, range 30-29,153). Articles included authors from mean 2.2 countries, most frequently the USA (n=43 articles), the UK (n=31) and China (n=23). Investigators' locations were often not reported, but most frequent were the UK (n=2711 investigators), USA (n=1029) and South Africa (n=269). There was a gender balance among participants across the studies (mean 49.4% female). The most frequent ethnic groups were white, Hispanic and Asian. Tweets mentioning the publications most commonly came from the USA (8.1%), the UK (3.1%) and Japan (2.9%). Conclusion(s): Despite COVID-19 being a global health emergency, most authors, investigators and readers of high impact COVID-19 vaccine RCT publications were from a small group of countries, with some notable exceptions. Numerous studies did not report the geographic location of investigators or participant ethnicity. Consistent and transparent reporting would support the drive towards greater diversity and representation in medical research.
ABSTRACT
The current outbreak of COVID-19 is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus that has affected > 210 countries. Various steps are taken by different countries to tackle the current war-like health situation. In India, the Ministry of AYUSH released a self-care advisory for immunomodulation measures during the COVID-19 and this review article discusses the detailed scientific rationale associated with this advisory. Authors have spotted and presented in-depth insight of advisory in terms of immunomodulatory, antiviral, antibacterial, co-morbidity associated actions, and their probable mechanism of action. Immunomodulatory actions of advised herbs with no significant adverse drug reaction/toxicity strongly support the extension of advisory for COVID-19 prevention, prophylaxis, mitigations, and rehabilitation capacities. This advisory also emphasized Dhyana (meditation) and Yogasanas as a holistic approach in enhancing immunity, mental health, and quality of life. The present review may open-up new meadows for research and can provide better conceptual leads for future researches in immunomodulation, antiviral-development, psychoneuroimmunology, especially for COVID-19.Copyright © 2021, Institute of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University.
ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 was first detected in December 2019 and rapidly spread to become a pandemic. The disease associated with this infection (COVID-19) disproportionally affect pregnant people and their offspring, making them a high-risk group for morbidity and mortality. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy is associated with increased risk of progression to severe/critical disease and maternal death. It is also associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes including hypertensive disorders and prematurity. While vaccination is one of the most effective approaches to stem the COVID-19 pandemic, pregnant people were originally excluded from all randomized vaccine trials. Following studies examining the effects of COVID vaccine in pregnancy have focused on three general areas: maternal and fetal antibody production, short-term fetal safety, and overall pregnancy outcomes. In this presentation, we will summarize the COVID-19 disease phenotype in pregnancy, describe the association between COVID-19 and adverse pregnancy outcomes, and describe the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 therapeutics and vaccines in pregnancy.
ABSTRACT
Worldwide, infectious diseases have contributed significantly to morbidity and mortality;among the leading causes of death are pneumonia, respiratory infections and Covid-19. Stem cell therapy will be used to treat virus-infected patients in an effective and safe manner. A cross-sectional questionnaire was used to collect data from doctors. Most doctors are aware of the applications of stem cells, but they do not confirm their usage because clinical trials are ongoing. Instead, they show support for using stem cells to treat patients. Stem cells have been hoping to help repair damaged tissues in the respiratory system to promote faster recovery. Stem Cells are being studied in current clinical trials for their efficacy and safety in virus severe pneumonia and respiratory infections. The doctors suggested that stem cells have been used in infectious diseases to improve their health.Copyright © 2023 Health Biotechnology And Biopharma. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The proceedings contain 96 papers. The topics discussed include: practical pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorder in the age of fentanyl;can COVID-19 cause acute psychosis in pediatric patients? a case report;a survey of bullying experiences in a child and adolescent psychiatric clinic population;acute emergence of suicidal thoughts following Lemborexant initiation: an adverse reaction case report;assessing the unmet clinical need and opportunity for digital therapeutic intervention in schizophrenia: perspective from people with schizophrenia;rapid antidepressant effects and MADRS item improvements with AXS-05 (DEXTROMETHORPHAN-BUPROPION), an oral NMDA receptor antagonist in major depressive disorder: results from two randomized double-blind, controlled trials;targeting lncRNA NEAT1 impedes Alzheimers disease progression via MicroRNA-193a mediated CREB/BDNF and NRF2/NQO1 pathways;and impact of AXS-05 (DEXTROMETHORPHAN-BUPROPION), an Oral NMDA receptor antagonist, on Anhedonic symptoms in major depressive disorder.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) often results in high mortality and morbidity. Hemoadsorption therapy, such as CytoSorb©, is being increasingly used to target the underlying hyperinflammation that occurs with ARDS. This review aims to evaluate the available data on the use of CytoSorb in combination with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) in severe ARDS cases, and to assess its effects on inflammatory, laboratory, and clinical parameters, as well as on patient outcomes. Method(s): A systematic literature review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA) statement. Whenever possible, an analysis of changes in relevant biomarkers and clinical parameters was performed. Result(s): CytoSorb© therapy was associated with significant reductions in circulating levels of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 (p = 0.039 and p = 0.049, respectively), as well as an increase in PaO2/FiO2 levels (p = 0.028). There was also a trend towards reduced norepinephrine dosage (p = 0.067). Mortality rates in patients treated with CytoSorb©tended to be lower than in the control groups, but these studies had high heterogeneity and low power. In an exploratory analysis of 90-day mortality in COVID19 patients receiving V-V ECMO, the therapy was associated with a reduced risk of death. Conclusion(s): Overall, the reviewed data suggests that CytoSorb© therapy can effectively reduce inflammation and potentially improve survival in ARDS patients treated with V-V ECMO. Therefore, early initiation of CytoSorb ©in conjunction with ECMO may offer a promising approach to enhance lung rest and promote recovery in patients with severe ARDS. A randomised trial is warranted to confirm our findings.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims Cases of new autoimmune and autoinflammatory conditions have been reported among COVID-19 survivors. A literature review on newonset autoimmune connective tissue diseases (ACTDs) following infection with COVID-19 is lacking.This systematic literature review aimed to evaluate the potential association between COVID-19 infection and the development of new-onset ACTDs in adults. Methods Articles published until September 2022, investigating the association between COVID-19 infection and new-onset ACTDs were included. The ''population'' searched was patients with disease terms for autoimmune connective tissue diseases, including (but not limited to) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Sjogren's syndrome, systemic sclerosis (SSc), any idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM), antisynthetase syndrome, mixed CTD and undifferentiated CTD (and related MeSH terms), with ''intervention'' as COVID-19 and related terms. For terms for COVID-19, a dedicated search strategy developed by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence was used.Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched, restricted to English-language articles only. Eligible articles were: case reports and series (of any sample size), observational studies, qualitative studies and randomised controlled trials. Patients developing ACTDs without prior COVID-19 or reporting flares of existing ACTDs were excluded. Information was extracted on patient demographics, new ACTDs' onset time, clinical characteristics, COVID-19 and ACTD treatment, and COVID-19 and ACTDs outcomes. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022358750). Results After deduplication, 2239 articles were identified. After screening title and , 2196 papers were excluded, with 43 proceeding to fulltext screening. Ultimately, 28 articles (all single case reports) were included. Of the 28 included patients, 64.3% were female. The mean age was 51.1 years (range 20-89 years). The USA reported the most cases (9/28). ACTD diagnoses comprised: 11 (39.3%) IIM (including 4 cases of dermatomyositis);7 (25%) SLE;4 (14.3%) anti-synthetase syndrome;4 (14.3%) SSc;2 (7.1%) other ACTD (one diagnosed with lupus/MCTD overlap). Of eight, four (14.3%) patients (including that with lupus/MCTD) were diagnosed with lupus nephritis. The average onset time from COVID-19 infection to ACTD diagnosis was 23.7days. A third of the patients were admitted to critical care, one for ACTD treatment for SLE with haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (14 sessions of plasmapheresis, rituximab and intravenous corticosteroids) and nine due to COVID-19. The majority (80%) of patients went into remission of ACTD following treatment, while two (10%) patients died- one due to macrophage activation syndrome associated with anti-synthetase syndrome and two from unreported causes. Conclusion Our results suggest a potential association between COVID-19 infection and new-onset ACTDs, predominantly in young females, reflective of wider CTD epidemiology. The aetiology and mechanisms by which ACTDs arise following COVID-19 infection remain unknown and require more robust epidemiological data.
ABSTRACT
Risk factors for severe COVID-19 are also associated with periodontitis. They are smoking, older age, obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. The aim of the study was to select and analyze publications that consider a possible relationship between inflammatory periodontal diseases and the severity of COVID-19. Material and methods. The search for publications by the key words was conducted using the electronic databases: Cochrane Library;MEDLINE, eLIBRARY for systematic review. We selected 94 publications, the systematic review included 10 scientific articles presenting the results of randomized trials. Results. The results of the analysis showed the connection between COVID-19 severity and inflammatory periodontal diseases presence. In the patients with severe COVID-19 on the background of periodontitis it was established a high risk for artificial lung ventilation prescription. The course of COVID-19 is possibly depending on high expression of ACE2 receptors in oral mucosal cells and aspiration of pathogenic bacteria from periodontal tissues with saliva on the background of SARS-CoV-2 viral infection. The bacterial etiology of periodontitis plays important role of an immunological trigger that causes hyperreaction of humoral and cellular immunity, NETosis activation and NLRP3 inflammation. Conclusion. The presence of periodontitis in patients with overweight and obesity, DM or hypertension may be associated with severe COVID-19 course, possible development of complications and pneumonia.Copyright © Eco-Vector, 2023. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The proceedings contain 343 papers. The topics discussed include: implementation of a disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug blood monitoring software: 8 years of experience in a single center;effectiveness of colchicine among patients with COVID-19 infection: a randomized, open labelled, clinical trial;rheumatic autoimmune diseases following COVID-19 infection: an observational study in Iraqi Kurdistan region;COVID-19 in male elite Irish-based athletes at a national sports institute;the effects of a pain management program for patients with an inflammatory arthritis;a retrospective analysis of the effectiveness safety of platelet rich plasma injections in primary osteoarthritis in knee joint, in patients attending a tertiary care hospital, Sri Lanka;a cohort study;do proformas used in fracture liaison service appointments reflect national osteoporosis clinical standards? a content analysis;calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal in operated rheumatoid arthritis of the knee;cardiac amyloidosis: a case series of 31 patients with a comprehensive literature review;scoping review for the application of center of pressure for patient or intervention assessment in rheumatoid conditions;and four SNPs associated with monocyte/macrophage cell lineage uniquely associated with CRPS-1 in discovery and replication cohorts and suggest predisposition to regional osteopenia and digit misperception.
ABSTRACT
Comprehensive medication management (CMM) is increasingly provided by health care teams through telehealth or hybrid modalities. The purpose of this scoping literature review was to assess the published literature and examine the economic, clinical, and humanistic outcomes of CMM services provided by pharmacists via telehealth or hybrid modalities. This scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were included if they: reported on economic, clinical, or humanistic outcomes;were conducted via telehealth or hybrid modalities;included a pharmacist on their interprofessional team;and evaluated CMM services. The search was conducted between January 1, 2000, and September 28, 2021. The search strategy was adapted for use in Medline (PubMed);Embase;Cochrane;Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature;PsychINFO;International Pharmaceutical s;Scopus;and grey literature. Four reviewers extracted data using a screening tool developed for this study and reviewed for risk of bias. Authors screened 3500 articles, from which 11 studies met the inclusion criteria (9 observational studies, 2 RCTs). In seven studies, clinical outcomes improved with telehealth CMM interventions compared to either usual care, face-to-face CMM, or educational controls, as shown by the statistically significant changes in chronic disease clinical outcomes. Two studies evaluated and found increased patient and provider satisfaction. One study described a source of revenue for a telehealth CMM service. Overall, study results indicate that telehealth CMM services, in select cases, may be associated with improved clinical outcomes, but the methods of the included studies were not homogenous enough to conclude that telehealth or hybrid modalities were superior to in-person CMM. To understand the full impact on the Quadruple Aim, additional research is needed to investigate the financial outcomes of CMM conducted using telehealth or hybrid technologies.Copyright © 2022 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims Immunocompromised patients have a reduced ability to generate antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination, and are at a high risk of SARSPOSTERS CoV-2 infection, complications and mortality. Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab (Evusheld) is a combination of two monoclonal antibodies which bind to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, preventing the virus entering human cells. Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab has been approved as COVID-19 prophylaxis for immunocompromised individuals, and is being used in over 32 different countries. The phase III PROVENT clinical trial found that high-risk participants prophylactically administered Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab had a significantly reduced risk of COVID- 19 infection after three and six months compared to controls. However, the PROVENT trial was conducted prior to the SARS-CoV- 2 Omicron wave, and did not include participants who had been previously vaccinated or infected. This systematic review provides an updated summary of the real-world clinical evidence of the efficacy of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab for immunocompromised patients. The review reports breakthrough COVID-19 infections as its primary outcome. COVID-19-related hospitalisations, ITU admissions and mortality were included as secondary outcomes. Methods Two independent reviewers conducted electronic searches of PubMed and Medxriv, on 03/08/22 and 01/10/22. Clinical studies which reported the primary outcome of breakthrough COVID-19 infections after Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab administration were included. Clinical effectiveness was determined using the case-control clinical effectiveness methodology. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between intervention and control groups were also calculated. The GRADE tool was used to assess the level of certainty for the primary outcome. Results 17 clinical studies were included in the review, with a total of 24,773 immunocompromised participants from across the world, of whom 10,775 received Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab. One randomised controlled trial, ten retrospective cohort studies (two of which were preprints) and six prospective cohort studies (one preprint) were included. The majority of studies reported clinical outcomes during the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron wave. Six studies compared a Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab intervention group to a control group. Reasons for participant immunocompromise included rheumatology patients treated with immunosuppressant drugs, transplant recipients and those with malignancies. Overall, the clinical effectiveness of prophylactic Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab against COVID- 19 breakthrough infection was 40.47% (CI 29.82-49.67;p<0.0001), COVID-19 hospitalisation- 69.23% (CI: 50.78-81.64;p<0.00001), ITU admission- 87.89% (CI: 47.12-98.66;p=0.0008), all-cause mortality- 81.29% (66.93-90.28;p<0.0001 and COVID-19-specifc mortality- 86.36% (CI:-6.21-99.70;p=0.0351). Conclusion There is a growing body of real-world evidence validating the original PROVENT phase III study regarding the clinical effectiveness of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab as prophylaxis for immunocompromised groups, notably demonstrating effectiveness during the Omicron wave. This systematic review demonstrates the significant clinical effectiveness of prophylactic Tixagevimb/Cilgavimab at reducing COVID-19 infection, hospitalisation, ITU admission and mortality for immunosuppressed individuals. It is critically important that largerscale and better-controlled studies are performed to highlight the significant clinical benefit of prophylactic antibody treatment in immunocompromised groups.
ABSTRACT
Introduction There is currently a lack of evidence on clinical nutrition in Covid-19. Aim of the work: Systematic overview of clinical nutrition in Covid-19. Material and methods A systematic literature search: 2 meta-analyses, 12 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, 9 prospective randomized controlled trials, 3 prospective observational studies, 7 retrospective studies, 25 narrative reviews. Results a) Obese patients have an increased risk of a severe course of the disease, b) there is a connection between obesity and an increased risk of death, c) Covid-19 mortality increases from a BMI>27 kg/m2, in all BMI classes 1,6% per 1 kg/m2 in the event of weight gain, in the case of severe obesity (> 40-45 BMI) by a factor of 1,5 to 2 and per 5 kg/m2, d) the risk of a severe course of Covid-19 increases also with increased visceral fat tissue percentage, total body fat mass and upper abdominal circumference, e) the mortality rate can be 10 times higher in malnourished Covid-19 patients, f) serum albumin provides evidence of a poor course of the disease, g) enteral omega-3 fatty acid intake could stabilize kidney function and improve the outcome, h) foods with a low glycemic index should be preferred, i) vitamin D deficiency should be avoided, daily vitamin D and zinc supplementation can be beneficial, j) one-time high dose vitamin D and enteral vitamin C provide no benefit, but the risk of thrombosis could be reduced and the antibody response enhanced with zinc, k) nutritional intervention reduces mortality. Conclusion Screening and assessment of nutritional status are important in Covid-19 patients. Overall, there are insufficient clinical results on specific nutritional therapy.Copyright © 2022 Georg Thieme Verlag. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: Currently five SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are approved in North America (FDA) and Europe (EMA). Across the world other vaccines have been developed but not approved in high-income countries. Of the approved vaccines, 2 are mRNA vaccines, 2 are viral vectored vaccines, and 1 is a protein subunit vaccine. As immunogenicity markers are increasingly being used by regulatory agencies as surrogate markers for vaccine efficacy to inform authorization decisions, this meta-analysis compared the size of immunogenicity responses response elicited by the different COVID-19 vaccine types (mRNA, protein subunit, inactivated virus, viral vectors) and approved and unapproved COVID-19 vaccines. Method(s): Systematic review of trial registers and databases identified RCTs for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Risk of bias analysis was conducted using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. High risk of bias studies were excluded from analysis. Meta-analysis of seroconversion rates and geometric antibody titers (GMT) for neutralising (NAb) and anti-spike antibodies was conducted, each compared with a placebo using random effects model Cochrane-Mantel Haenszel Tests. Result(s): All studies assessed immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines on healthy non-immunocompromised adults between the age of 18 and 59. Statistically significant difference was identified between the different vaccine types for NAb GMT, anti-spike GMT, NAb seroconversion, and anti-spike seroconversion (P< 0.00001 for all). Conversely, no statistical significant difference was identified between approved and unapproved vaccines for NAb seroconversion (P=0.39), Nab GMT (P=0.36), anti-spike seroconversion (P=0.07), and antispike GMT (P=0.54). mRNA vaccines had the best immunogenicity results for NAb seroconversion, GMT, and anti-spike seroconversion. Viral vector vaccines had the lowest results for NAb seroconversion and GMT, while inactivated viruses had the lowest result for anti-spike seroconversion and mRNA vaccines for anti-spike GMT. High heterogeneity was observed across the different studies. Conclusion(s): This metanalysis of 35 randomised trials in 33,813 participants showed approved and unapproved vaccines to be comparable in postvaccination GMT values and seroconversion for both NAb and anti-spike. However, while comparing COVID-19 vaccines by vaccine types, statistically significant differences are observed. Variations in study designs, populations enrolled, and infection prevalence during trial duration could have influenced results.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore the medical evidence published until April 20, 2022, about the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in COVID-19 patients. METHODOLOGY: Scoping review that included PubMed and Scopus, searching for clinical trials and observational studies in English and Spanish. Additionally, records of clinical trials from the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were analyzed. RESULT(S): Fifty-four documents were included: retrospective cohort studies (n = 20), randomized clinical trials (n = 16), case control studies (n = 7), non-randomized clinical trials (n = 5) and prospective cohort studies (n = 6), with a total study population of 20,007 patients. There were 15 records of clinical trials of which 10 were registered in the US National Library of Medicine. CONCLUSION(S): Tocilizumab could be effective and safe to treat patients with moderate to critical COVID-19, in conjunction with additional immunomodulators and antivirals. A greater number of randomized clinical trials, however, are needed to explore the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab.Copyright © 2023 Comunicaciones Cientificas Mexicanas S.A. de C.V.. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction/Aim: Accumulating evidence indicates that an early, robust type 1 interferon (IFN) response to SARS-CoV-2 is critical for COVID-19 outcomes. Our objective was to examine the prophylactic potential of IFN treatment to limit viral transmission Methods: A cluster-randomised clinical trial was undertaken to determine effects of IFNbeta-1a treatment on SARS-CoV-2 household transmission (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04552379). Index cases were identified from confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases in Santiago, Chile, with 341 index cases and 831 household contacts enrolled. Households received 125 mug subcutaneous pegylated-IFNbeta-1a on days 1, 6, & 11 (172 households, 607 participants), or standard care (169 households, 565 participants). Primary outcomes included: (1) duration of viral shedding in infected cases (IC-INF), (2) transmission to treatment-eligible household contacts (EHC-ITT) at day 11. Result(s): Of 1172 individuals randomised, 53 individuals withdrew from the study (IFNbeta-1a = 35, SOC = 18). Eighty-two households (IFNbeta-1a = 36, SOC = 46) where the index case was SARS-CoV-2 negative on days 1 & 6, or with no SARS-CoV-2 negative contacts at recruitment, were excluded from exploratory analyses. Treatment with IFNbeta-1a: had no effect on duration of viral shedding in the IC-INF population (primary outcome 1), had no effect on transmission of SARS-CoV-2 at day 11 in the EHC-ITT population (primary outcome 2) but an effect was observed in a sensitivity analysis at day 6 (EHC-ITT: OR = 0.493, 95% CI = 0.256-0.949), reduced duration of hospitalisation in the IC-INF population and incidence of hospitalisation in per-protocol index cases (secondary outcome 3). In exploratory frequentist analysis, a significant effect of IFNbeta-1a treatment on SARS-CoV-2 transmission by day 11 (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.36-0.99), and a Bayesian analysis identified a significant reduction in the odds of transmission (OR = -0.85, 95% credible interval = -1.59--0.16). Conclusion(s): Ring prophylaxis with IFNbeta-1a had no effect on duration of viral shedding but reduces the probability of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to uninfected, post-exposure contacts within a household.